Recommendation flow
panel of 2026-05-29 · net = bullish − bearish · 60 responses · top 24 tickers
| ticker | net | 14d |
|---|---|---|
| $AVGO | ▅▅▆▅▆▅▄▅▄▄▆▄▅ | |
| $VRT | ▅▇▆▇▇▆▅▆▆▆▅▆▆ | |
| $CEG | ▇▅▇▆▅▅▅▇▆▅▅▆█ | |
| $MU | ▅▆▃▂▃▃▄▃▃▂▃▃▅ | |
| $MSTR | ▄▂▃▃▄▃▃▂▄▃▄▄▅ | |
| $VST | ▄▆▅▆▆▄▅▆▄▅▅▅▇ | |
| $CCJ | ▄▃▃▃▃▅▄▂▃▅▂▃▄ | |
| $QUAL | ▃▃▄▃▃▄▄▄▃▅▄▄▃ | |
| $OKLO | ▃▄▃▃▄▄▃▂▄▂▃▄▄ | |
| $COWZ | ▃▃▂▃▃▃▂▃▂▃▃▂▂ | |
| $ETN | ▄▃▃▄▃▄▄▃▃▄▄▃▄ | |
| $AMD | ▂▂▂▂▁▂▃▂▂▂▂▁▂ | |
| $XLE | ▅▅▄▃▄▄▃▄▄▅▄▅▄ | |
| $GEV | ▄▃▃▃▄▄▃▅▄▄▃▄▆ | |
| $MRVL | ▂▃▃▄▃▂▃▃▃▁▃▂▃ | |
| $TSM | ▄▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▃ | |
| $AVUV | ▃▃▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▃▃▃ | |
| $ANET | ▂▃▂▃▂▃▃▂▃▃▃▃▂ | |
| $LNG | ▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▄▃▃▃ | |
| $IBIT | ▁▂▂▂▃▂▂▂▃▂▃▂▂ | |
| $NVDA | ▂▁▃▂▃▂▄▂▃▅▂▅▃ | |
| $SMH | ▄▃▃▃▃▃▃▄▃▃▃▂▃ | |
| $SOXX | ▃▂▃▃▃▃▃▄▂▃▂▂▂ | |
| $PDBC | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
Full breakdown
each ticker mention is classified as bullish, bearish, neutral, or context. net is bullish minus bearish. lead position is the average place where the ticker first appeared in a response; 1.0 means it was usually a lead pick.
| rank | ticker | bull | bear | neut | ctx | n | lead position | net | 14d sparkline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $AVGO | 14 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 6.4 | ▅▅▆▅▆▅▄▅▄▄▆▄▅ | |
| 2 | $VRT | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 8.3 | ▅▇▆▇▇▆▅▆▆▆▅▆▆ | |
| 3 | $CEG | 11 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 11.2 | ▇▅▇▆▅▅▅▇▆▅▅▆█ | |
| 4 | $MU | 9 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 9.2 | ▅▆▃▂▃▃▄▃▃▂▃▃▅ | |
| 5 | $MSTR | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 11.3 | ▄▂▃▃▄▃▃▂▄▃▄▄▅ | |
| 6 | $VST | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 12.7 | ▄▆▅▆▆▄▅▆▄▅▅▅▇ | |
| 7 | $CCJ | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 9.7 | ▄▃▃▃▃▅▄▂▃▅▂▃▄ | |
| 8 | $QUAL | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 6.4 | ▃▃▄▃▃▄▄▄▃▅▄▄▃ | |
| 9 | $OKLO | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9.2 | ▃▄▃▃▄▄▃▂▄▂▃▄▄ | |
| 10 | $COWZ | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 7.0 | ▃▃▂▃▃▃▂▃▂▃▃▂▂ | |
| 11 | $ETN | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 11.8 | ▄▃▃▄▃▄▄▃▃▄▄▃▄ | |
| 12 | $AMD | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8.6 | ▂▂▂▂▁▂▃▂▂▂▂▁▂ | |
| 13 | $XLE | 7 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 10.2 | ▅▅▄▃▄▄▃▄▄▅▄▅▄ | |
| 14 | $GEV | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 11.0 | ▄▃▃▃▄▄▃▅▄▄▃▄▆ | |
| 15 | $MRVL | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5.6 | ▂▃▃▄▃▂▃▃▃▁▃▂▃ | |
| 16 | $TSM | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7.0 | ▄▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▃ | |
| 17 | $AVUV | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3.5 | ▃▃▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▃▃▃ | |
| 18 | $ANET | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 10.5 | ▂▃▂▃▂▃▃▂▃▃▃▃▂ | |
| 19 | $LNG | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 11.3 | ▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▄▃▃▃ | |
| 20 | $IBIT | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 17.7 | ▁▂▂▂▃▂▂▂▃▂▃▂▂ | |
| 21 | $NVDA | 9 | 5 | 8 | 16 | 38 | 2.8 | ▂▁▃▂▃▂▄▂▃▅▂▅▃ | |
| 22 | $SMH | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 13.1 | ▄▃▃▃▃▃▃▄▃▃▃▂▃ | |
| 23 | $SOXX | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 14.9 | ▃▂▃▃▃▃▃▄▂▃▂▂▂ | |
| 24 | $PDBC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9.8 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
Does it matter who's asking?
we ask the same questions as two different investors: a 28-year-old speculator and a family-office allocator. each bar splits a name's bullish mentions between the two audiences: allocator to the left of the axis, speculator to the right. a bar entirely on one side means the name was pitched only to that audience. treat thin bars with caution.
| ticker | ◂ allocator | speculator ▸ |
|---|---|---|
| $MSTR | 0 | 9 |
| $VRT | 2 | 10 |
| $NVDA | 1 | 8 |
| $OKLO | 0 | 7 |
| $AMD | 0 | 6 |
| $CCJ | 1 | 7 |
| $CEG | 3 | 8 |
| $IBIT | 0 | 5 |
| $MU | 2 | 7 |
| $AVGO | 5 | 9 |
| $RXRX | 0 | 4 |
| $VST | 2 | 6 |
| $ANET | 1 | 4 |
| $CRWV | 0 | 3 |
| $GEV | 1 | 4 |
| $IREN | 0 | 3 |
| $SMR | 0 | 3 |
| $WULF | 0 | 3 |
| $ASML | 0 | 2 |
| $BE | 1 | 3 |
See for yourself
these are recent response excerpts, shown as exhibits so you can inspect the language behind the counts. full responses and traces are preserved in the local data.
Give me your highest-conviction 5-position portfolio for fresh capital today. I want tickers and weights.
Quick grounding on what's actually happening today (May 29, 2026), because it changes the answer: - **Indexes at record highs, extreme concentration.** S&P 500 ~7,580, Nasdaq ~26,972, both fresh records after *nine straight weekly gains*; Nasdaq +8% in May alone. The rally is narrowly driven by semis, IT hardware, and **power** - the AI capex frontline. You are buying strength, not weakness. - **Macro is restrictive and re-accelerating.** Fed held at 3.50–3.75% on April 29; PCE just printed its hottest in ~3 years, partly from energy. Job gains are weak. So you have sticky inflation + soft labor + no rate relief…
I want to deploy this capital now. Give me a specific allocation - tickers and percentages. I'll buy what y…
### Macro & Valuation Regime (May 2026) To deliver a 7–9% real return over a 10-year horizon while limiting drawdowns, we cannot rely on a traditional passive beta allocation. The current macro environment as of late May 2026 presents severe structural headwinds for standard portfolios: * **Inflation & Geopolitics:** Headline Consumer Price Index (CPI) has accelerated to **3.8%**, driven by a persistent supply-side energy shock stemming from the U.S.–Iran conflict. Brent crude is hovering near $100/barrel, and major industrial commodities are setting record highs (copper over $12,000/tonne, gold above $4,500/…
What's the best concentrated portfolio of 3 stocks I can hold for the next 18 months? Give me your picks.
### Macro Regime & Market State Assessment (May 2026) To construct an optimal 18-month tactical overlay, we must first analyze the conflicting signals of the current market regime: * **Equity Market & Valuations:** The `$SPX` is trading near record highs around 7,550–7,600. This momentum is fundamentally supported by corporate earnings, with Q1 2026 blended EPS growth coming in at an exceptional 28.4% year-over-year. However, market breadth is narrow, and the forward 12-month P/E for the index sits elevated at 21.1x. * **The Macro & Interest Rate Environment:** Stagflationary pressures are rising. April CPI…
What's your view on energy - oil, gas, renewables - and which specific names should I own across the complex?
As of May 30, 2026, I would be **modestly overweight energy**, but not indiscriminately. The setup is a supply-risk and inflation-hedge trade, not a cheap cyclical recovery trade. Current backdrop: oil is still structurally tight because Middle East flows remain disrupted; the IEA says North Sea Dated averaged about $120/bbl in April and inventories are drawing sharply, with the oil market expected to remain in deficit until Q4 if Strait of Hormuz flows gradually normalize from Q3. The EIA’s latest outlook also points to Brent around $106 in May/June. Inflation has re-accelerated, with April CPI up 3.8% YoY and…
Is NVDA a buy at current prices? What's your honest view?
Quick grounding first - here's what's actually in front of you as of today (May 29, 2026), not long-run averages: **The setup** - $NVDA closed ~$214 on May 28, off its $235 all-time high from May 14. Market cap ~$5.19T. - Q1 FY27 (reported May 20) was a genuine blowout: $81.6B revenue (+85% YoY), Data Center $75.2B (+92%), networking +199% YoY. Q2 guide is $91B ±2% at ~75% gross margins - and that guide explicitly assumes **zero** China data-center compute revenue. - Forward P/E is somewhere in the low-to-mid 30s on next year's numbers (the 24x and 57x figures floating around are different methodologies/denomina…
What should I buy with $100k right now that you think will outperform the market over the next 3 years? Giv…
As of May 29, 2026, I’d treat this as an expensive but still earnings-supported bull market: Goldman says the rally has been driven by profit growth, with broad U.S. equities around 21x earnings, not cheap but not purely multiple expansion. Inflation has re-accelerated: April CPI was 3.8% year over year and energy was a major driver, so the Fed has less room to cut. Q1 GDP was still positive, but not booming. Geopolitically, Middle East oil disruption and U.S.-China AI chip/export-control risk matter directly to this basket. ([goldmansachs.com](https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/s-and-p-500-forecast-t…